Experience RS

Austin Chalk - Let's Talk Chalk

The Austin Chalk Formation has re-emerged in the oil and gas industry over the past few years, accounting for some of the most prolific wells in the L48. However, Austin Chalk success appears to be somewhat localized as wells offsetting strong producers often show much lower production.

The Giddings Field in East Texas is one of the largest historic Austin Chalk fields (Figure 1). With step-change improvements in resource extraction technology, E&Ps have continuously modified their approach to the Austin Chalk. This play was drilled conventionally from 1970 to 1990 with vertical wells targeting localized fracture zones (Figure 2). Later, these extensive fracture zones were targeted horizontally until the mid-2010s. These earlier designs were either unfrac’ed or stimulated with acid treatments. Within the last four years, horizontal wells within the field shifted from conventional, structural targets to a “hybrid” play with contiguous matrix porosity and hydrocarbon saturation trends, employing multi-stage frac’ing to induce permeability. Despite relying on different reservoir parameters than those historically targeted, the formation has supported increased activity and delivered success in some previously uncommercial or untested areas.

But why do we see mixed success in this play? Carbonate reservoirs, like the Austin Chalk, are geologically complex and have less predictable reservoir properties, making them a challenge to develop. The variability is influenced by depositional environment, burial conditions, diagenesis (chemical or mechanical alteration of the rock) and active faulting. The best operators will have a robust understanding of this structural and stratigraphic complexity using seismic data and cored wells to delineate the Austin Chalk landing zone and faults. Operators are consistently challenged by repeatability, drilling accuracy and geological risks (such as drilling through unforeseen faults or water-bearing upper Austin Chalk intervals).

The long production history, high well control and varied well configurations in the Giddings field can be leveraged as an exploitation analogue to the emerging Louisiana Austin Chalk.

FIGURE 1 | Giddings Field Austin Chalk Wells


FIGURE 2 | Schematic of Historical Production Uplift in the Giddings Field






RS Energy Group Disclosure Statement:

© Copyright 2019 RS Energy Group Canada, Inc. (RSEG). All rights reserved.

All trademarks, service marks and logos used in this document are proprietary to RSEG. This document should not be copied, distributed or reproduced, in whole or in part. The material presented is provided for information purposes only and is not to be used or considered as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell any securities or other financial instruments. Information contained herein has been compiled by RSEG and prepared from various public and industry sources that we believe to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, expressed or implied is made by RSEG, its affiliates or any other person as to the accuracy or completeness of the information. Such information is provided with the expectation that it will be viewed as part of a mosaic of analysis and should not be relied upon on a stand-alone basis. Any opinions expressed herein reflect the judgment of RSEG as of the date of this document and are subject to change at any time as new or additional data and information is received and analyzed. RSEG undertakes no duty to update this information, or to provide supplemental information to anyone viewing this material.  To the full extent provided by law, neither RSEG nor any of its affiliates, nor any other person accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of the information contained herein. The recipient assumes all risks and liability with regard to any use or application of the data included herein.

Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements:

This public communication may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements are based on our current expectations about future events or future financial performance. In this context, forward-looking statements often contain words such as "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "believe," "seek," "see," "will," "would," or "target” or other words that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes.

These statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause the events we discuss not to occur or to differ significantly from what we expect. When evaluating the information included in this communication, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our judgment only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly revise or update these forward-looking statements to reflect events and circumstances that arise after the date hereof.

Note to UK Persons:

RSEG is not an authorised person as defined in the UK’s Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (“FSMA”) and the content of this report has not been approved by such an authorised person.  You will accordingly not be able to rely upon most of the rules made under FSMA for the protection of clients of financial services businesses, and you will not have the benefit of the UK’s Financial Services Compensation Scheme. This document is only directed at (a) persons who have professional experience in matters relating to investments (being 'investment professionals' within the meaning of Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the "FPO")), and (b) High net worth companies, trusts etc of a type described in Article 49(2) of the FPO (all such persons being "relevant persons").  RSEG’s services are available only to relevant persons and will be engaged in only with relevant persons. This report must not be acted or relied upon by persons who are not relevant persons.  Persons of a type described in Article 49(2) of the FPO comprise (a) any body corporate which has, or which is a member of the same group as an undertaking which has, a called up share capital or net assets of not less than ( i ) in the case of a body corporate which has more than 20 members or is a subsidiary undertaking of an undertaking which has more than 20 members, £500,000 and (ii) in any other case, £5 million, (b) any unincorporated association or partnership which has net assets of not less than £5 million, (c) the trustee of a high value trust within the meaning of Article 49(6) of the FPO and (d) any person ('A') whilst acting in the capacity of director, officer or employee of a person ('B') falling within any of (a), (b) or (c) above where A's responsibilities, when acting in that capacity, involve him in B's engaging in investment activity.