Experience RS

Inter-Zone Sequencing - Who Suffers?

For Permian operators, understanding well spacing is critical to unlocking full stacked-pay potential. Along with horizontal and vertical spacing, operators must understand the impact of inter-zone bench sequencing on well productivity as remaining locations in primary intervals continue to decrease.

Some operators co-develop wells horizontally across one interval, returning several months later to develop the interval directly above or below, usually in a stagger-stacked configuration. A common result of tightly spaced child well development is that the lagged (child) wells underperform as the reservoir has already been partially depleted by pre-existing (parent) well production; this is often exacerbated when the parent wells were completed with high intensities. In contrast, RSEG has also found cases where parent well productivity is more severely impaired than the child well.

FIGURE 1 | Parent Well Degradation Due to Child Inter-Zone Development


Figure 1 demonstrates a scenario where the Wolfcamp B was co-developed in 2017 across a section followed by the Wolfcamp A about nine months later. The lagged wells were drilled ~260 feet above the parent wells and completed with higher proppant intensities. Modeling a type curve using only production prior to child well completions shows that expected Wolfcamp B parent well productivity decreases following child bench development. The current forecast EUR is roughly half of what the well was tracking prior to the Wolfcamp A bench coming online. RSEG believes the large child well completions and tight vertical spacing intensified competitive drainage between the Wolfcamp A and B wells, causing parent well production to fall off steeply. While the impact on the parent bench is more prominent, the child well forecast is also underperforming the standalone well Wolfcamp B type curve, as reservoir energy is likely being rapidly depleted between the competing zones.

As more operators return to previously developed sections to target zones above or below existing wells, not only is the quality of remaining inventory at risk, PDP reserves are also at risk. This phenomenon needs to be considered when valuing assets and companies. This impact highlights another justification for the co-development of benches where no known frac or flow barrier exists.


RS Energy Group Disclosure Statement:

© Copyright 2019 RS Energy Group Canada, Inc. (RSEG). All rights reserved.

All trademarks, service marks and logos used in this document are proprietary to RSEG. This document should not be copied, distributed or reproduced, in whole or in part. The material presented is provided for information purposes only and is not to be used or considered as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell any securities or other financial instruments. Information contained herein has been compiled by RSEG and prepared from various public and industry sources that we believe to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, expressed or implied is made by RSEG, its affiliates or any other person as to the accuracy or completeness of the information. Such information is provided with the expectation that it will be viewed as part of a mosaic of analysis and should not be relied upon on a stand-alone basis. Any opinions expressed herein reflect the judgment of RSEG as of the date of this document and are subject to change at any time as new or additional data and information is received and analyzed. RSEG undertakes no duty to update this information, or to provide supplemental information to anyone viewing this material.  To the full extent provided by law, neither RSEG nor any of its affiliates, nor any other person accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of the information contained herein. The recipient assumes all risks and liability with regard to any use or application of the data included herein.

Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements:

This public communication may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements are based on our current expectations about future events or future financial performance. In this context, forward-looking statements often contain words such as "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "believe," "seek," "see," "will," "would," or "target” or other words that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes.

These statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause the events we discuss not to occur or to differ significantly from what we expect. When evaluating the information included in this communication, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our judgment only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly revise or update these forward-looking statements to reflect events and circumstances that arise after the date hereof.

Note to UK Persons:

RSEG is not an authorised person as defined in the UK’s Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (“FSMA”) and the content of this report has not been approved by such an authorised person.  You will accordingly not be able to rely upon most of the rules made under FSMA for the protection of clients of financial services businesses, and you will not have the benefit of the UK’s Financial Services Compensation Scheme. This document is only directed at (a) persons who have professional experience in matters relating to investments (being 'investment professionals' within the meaning of Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the "FPO")), and (b) High net worth companies, trusts etc of a type described in Article 49(2) of the FPO (all such persons being "relevant persons").  RSEG’s services are available only to relevant persons and will be engaged in only with relevant persons. This report must not be acted or relied upon by persons who are not relevant persons.  Persons of a type described in Article 49(2) of the FPO comprise (a) any body corporate which has, or which is a member of the same group as an undertaking which has, a called up share capital or net assets of not less than ( i ) in the case of a body corporate which has more than 20 members or is a subsidiary undertaking of an undertaking which has more than 20 members, £500,000 and (ii) in any other case, £5 million, (b) any unincorporated association or partnership which has net assets of not less than £5 million, (c) the trustee of a high value trust within the meaning of Article 49(6) of the FPO and (d) any person ('A') whilst acting in the capacity of director, officer or employee of a person ('B') falling within any of (a), (b) or (c) above where A's responsibilities, when acting in that capacity, involve him in B's engaging in investment activity.