Experience RS

Marcellus – When the Only Way Is Up


Jason Levesque, M.Sc., G.I.T. Senior Associate

Author Biography

Jason joined RSEG’s geological team in February 2018 and focuses on the US Mid-Continent. He previously interned for Southwestern Energy in Houston as well as Husky, Enerplus and Suncor in Calgary. Jason earned his bachelor’s degree in geology from the University of New Brunswick in 2012 and his masters in geology and geophysics from the University of Calgary in 2017.

With the highest normalized recoveries and lowest breakevens, the Marcellus play in the northeastern Pennsylvania region has long been the crown jewel of shale gas plays in the Lower 48. This region of the play has the unique advantage of offering stacked intervals with the primary target being the Lower Marcellus. Remaining high-quality inventory in the Core NE region is becoming a growing concern, and some operators have begun developing the Upper Marcellus interval more regularly as a result.

The upper interval may not feature the same eye-popping 3+ Bcf/1,000’ recoveries compared to its lower, deeper sibling, but it still ranks next in-line in the L48 with average 30-year estimated ultimate recoveries (EURs) around 2 Bcf/1000’. So where is the Upper Marcellus viable and what drives the difference in recoveries?

The high-quality region of the Upper Marcellus is similar to the Lower interval except it is limited in the west by the thickness of the underlying Cherry Valley Limestone. The limestone separates the intervals and needs to be at least 15 feet thick to act as a frac barrier so that both can be developed without vertical interference (Figure 1). To the south and east, the rock approaches the "Line of Death" where it is overly mature and can no longer generate gas. To the north, shallower depths and lower pressures result in lower recoveries.

The main rock quality differences between the stacked zones are showcased in Figure 2. The purple electrofacies, which are concentrated in the Lower Marcellus, highlight superior rock quality in comparison to the Upper based on higher gamma ray and porosities plus lower water saturation. Higher gamma rays are important in the Marcellus as there exists a very strong positive correlation between gamma ray values and total organic carbon in the Marcellus (Figure 3). This is significant as the elevated thermal maturities in the NE region has led to incredible amounts of gas generation over time from the organic carbon. All the above translates into why we see higher recoveries coming out of the Lower Marcellus.

FIGURE 1 | Cherry Valley Isopach (star indicates location of type log in Figure 2)


FIGURE 2 |  Marcellus Type Log From Susquehanna County


FIGURE 3 | Correlation Between Gamma Ray and Total Organic Carbon in the Marcellus


RS Energy Group Disclosure Statement:

© Copyright 2020 RS Energy Group Canada, Inc. (RSEG). All rights reserved.

All trademarks, service marks and logos used in this document are proprietary to RSEG. This document should not be copied, distributed or reproduced, in whole or in part. The material presented is provided for information purposes only and is not to be used or considered as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell any securities or other financial instruments. Information contained herein has been compiled by RSEG and prepared from various public and industry sources that we believe to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, expressed or implied is made by RSEG, its affiliates or any other person as to the accuracy or completeness of the information. Such information is provided with the expectation that it will be viewed as part of a mosaic of analysis and should not be relied upon on a stand-alone basis. Any opinions expressed herein reflect the judgment of RSEG as of the date of this document and are subject to change at any time as new or additional data and information is received and analyzed. RSEG undertakes no duty to update this information, or to provide supplemental information to anyone viewing this material.  To the full extent provided by law, neither RSEG nor any of its affiliates, nor any other person accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of the information contained herein. The recipient assumes all risks and liability with regard to any use or application of the data included herein.

Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements:

This public communication may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements are based on our current expectations about future events or future financial performance. In this context, forward-looking statements often contain words such as "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "believe," "seek," "see," "will," "would," or "target” or other words that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes.

These statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause the events we discuss not to occur or to differ significantly from what we expect. When evaluating the information included in this communication, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our judgment only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly revise or update these forward-looking statements to reflect events and circumstances that arise after the date hereof.

Note to UK Persons:

RSEG is not an authorised person as defined in the UK’s Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (“FSMA”) and the content of this report has not been approved by such an authorised person.  You will accordingly not be able to rely upon most of the rules made under FSMA for the protection of clients of financial services businesses, and you will not have the benefit of the UK’s Financial Services Compensation Scheme. This document is only directed at (a) persons who have professional experience in matters relating to investments (being 'investment professionals' within the meaning of Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the "FPO")), and (b) High net worth companies, trusts etc of a type described in Article 49(2) of the FPO (all such persons being "relevant persons").  RSEG’s services are available only to relevant persons and will be engaged in only with relevant persons. This report must not be acted or relied upon by persons who are not relevant persons.  Persons of a type described in Article 49(2) of the FPO comprise (a) any body corporate which has, or which is a member of the same group as an undertaking which has, a called up share capital or net assets of not less than ( i ) in the case of a body corporate which has more than 20 members or is a subsidiary undertaking of an undertaking which has more than 20 members, £500,000 and (ii) in any other case, £5 million, (b) any unincorporated association or partnership which has net assets of not less than £5 million, (c) the trustee of a high value trust within the meaning of Article 49(6) of the FPO and (d) any person ('A') whilst acting in the capacity of director, officer or employee of a person ('B') falling within any of (a), (b) or (c) above where A's responsibilities, when acting in that capacity, involve him in B's engaging in investment activity.