Experience RS

North American Onshore: Leading the Pack With Price-Sensitive Rigs

Global onshore rig counts (excluding China and Russia) have climbed steadily since mid-2016 (Figure 1) and now sit at 1,822, ~62% above their lows but still below the peak of 3,549 achieved in February 2012.  

FIGURE 1 | Land Rigs (Ex. China and Russia)

Canadian and US onshore rigs have been the most price sensitive, experiencing the sharpest drop during the 2014-16 oil price slump (Figure 2). Canadian and US onshore rigs have bounced back, up 168% this year to 1,092 from the May 2016 low mark of 422. The rise in absolute rig count is amplified by an increase in well productivity and drilling efficiency gains.

FIGURE 2 | Onshore and Offshore Rigs Working in Canada and US

Although US onshore rig count has risen by ~100 % from August 2016, the offshore rig count has been slower to respond and is tracking below the trailing five-year range to date in 2017 (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3 | Historic US Onshore and Offshore Rig Count

This low level of offshore activity as observed in the US has also been seen globally (Figure 4). Within NOCAR (a RSEG-coined term for non-OPEC, non-Canadian, non-American and non-Russian output representing 24.2 MMbbl/d of total liquids production), the offshore rig count currently at 150 compared to a peak of 275 in 2013. While the increase in oil prices sparked a resurgence in L48 onshore rig activity, NOCAR rigs have been relatively slow to response, with both offshore and onshore rig activity currently tracking at or below the trailing five-year lows (Figure 5).

FIGURE 4 | Global Offshore Rigs (ex. China)

FIGURE 5 | Historic NOCAR Onshore and Offshore Rig Count

While RSEG expects reduced activity levels in most countries will lead to declining production within NOCAR, certain areas have remained stable or are poised to grow. We expect Brazil and Kazakhstan to ramp up production as both countries benefit from pre-investment in large-scale projects. Similarly, the Norwegian rig count (100% offshore) has remained relatively flat through the cycle, averaging ~17 rigs for the last 10 years (Figure 6). We believe Norway’s activity is explained by the mature nature of its resource base. Most drilling projects are extensions to previous projects or tiebacks. Ample infrastructure and facility capacity in the North Sea translates into low go-forward breakevens, allowing Norwegian operators to remain active in low price environments. But the lack of large-scale exploration inventory inhibits the country’s ability to grow production even at higher oil prices.

FIGURE 6 | Historic Norway Production and Rig Count 


RS Energy Group Disclosure Statement:

© Copyright 2020 RS Energy Group Canada, Inc. (RSEG). All rights reserved.

All trademarks, service marks and logos used in this document are proprietary to RSEG. This document should not be copied, distributed or reproduced, in whole or in part. The material presented is provided for information purposes only and is not to be used or considered as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell any securities or other financial instruments. Information contained herein has been compiled by RSEG and prepared from various public and industry sources that we believe to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, expressed or implied is made by RSEG, its affiliates or any other person as to the accuracy or completeness of the information. Such information is provided with the expectation that it will be viewed as part of a mosaic of analysis and should not be relied upon on a stand-alone basis. Any opinions expressed herein reflect the judgment of RSEG as of the date of this document and are subject to change at any time as new or additional data and information is received and analyzed. RSEG undertakes no duty to update this information, or to provide supplemental information to anyone viewing this material.  To the full extent provided by law, neither RSEG nor any of its affiliates, nor any other person accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of the information contained herein. The recipient assumes all risks and liability with regard to any use or application of the data included herein.

Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements:

This public communication may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements are based on our current expectations about future events or future financial performance. In this context, forward-looking statements often contain words such as "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "believe," "seek," "see," "will," "would," or "target” or other words that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes.

These statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause the events we discuss not to occur or to differ significantly from what we expect. When evaluating the information included in this communication, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our judgment only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly revise or update these forward-looking statements to reflect events and circumstances that arise after the date hereof.

Note to UK Persons:

RSEG is not an authorised person as defined in the UK’s Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (“FSMA”) and the content of this report has not been approved by such an authorised person.  You will accordingly not be able to rely upon most of the rules made under FSMA for the protection of clients of financial services businesses, and you will not have the benefit of the UK’s Financial Services Compensation Scheme. This document is only directed at (a) persons who have professional experience in matters relating to investments (being 'investment professionals' within the meaning of Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the "FPO")), and (b) High net worth companies, trusts etc of a type described in Article 49(2) of the FPO (all such persons being "relevant persons").  RSEG’s services are available only to relevant persons and will be engaged in only with relevant persons. This report must not be acted or relied upon by persons who are not relevant persons.  Persons of a type described in Article 49(2) of the FPO comprise (a) any body corporate which has, or which is a member of the same group as an undertaking which has, a called up share capital or net assets of not less than ( i ) in the case of a body corporate which has more than 20 members or is a subsidiary undertaking of an undertaking which has more than 20 members, £500,000 and (ii) in any other case, £5 million, (b) any unincorporated association or partnership which has net assets of not less than £5 million, (c) the trustee of a high value trust within the meaning of Article 49(6) of the FPO and (d) any person ('A') whilst acting in the capacity of director, officer or employee of a person ('B') falling within any of (a), (b) or (c) above where A's responsibilities, when acting in that capacity, involve him in B's engaging in investment activity.